04047nas a2200973 4500008004100000022001400041024001700055245011000072210006900182260000900251300001200260490000700272520168800279653002101967653001401988653001602002653001402018653000902032653000802041653001502049653001202064653000802076653001102084653001202095653001902107653001302126653001402139653001502153653001602168653002502184653001402209653001302223100001702236700001802253700001702271700001502288700001702303700001902320700001602339700001702355700001702372700001702389700001902406700001702425700001502442700002002457700001502477700001902492700001302511700001602524700001602540700001502556700001702571700001702588700001802605700001302623700001902636700001502655700001502670700001302685700001302698700001502711700001702726700001702743700001602760700001202776700001502788700001502803700001402818700001602832700001502848700001602863700001702879700001302896700001402909700001502923700001602938700001602954700001502970700001602985700001503001700001903016856003803035 2012 eng d a1445-5226 aPapyrus 357300aWhat happens to the traditional taxonomy when a well-known tropical saturniid moth fauna is DNA barcoded?0 aWhat happens to the traditional taxonomy when a wellknown tropic c2012 a478-5050 v263 a
"Biodiversity of tropical Saturniidae, as measured through traditionally described and catalogued species, strongly risks pooling cryptic species under one name. We examined the DNA barcodes, morphology, habitus and ecology of 32 ‘well known’ species of dry forest saturniid moths from Area de Conservacion Guanacaste (ACG) in north-western Costa Rica and found that they contain as many as 49 biological entities that are probably separate species. The most prominent splitting of traditional species – Eacles imperialis, Automeris zugana, Automeris tridens, Othorene verana, Hylesia dalina, Dirphia avia, Syssphinx molina, Syssphinx colla, and Syssphinx quadrilineata – is where one species was believed to breed in dry forest and rain forest, but is found to be two biological entities variously distinguishable by DNA barcodes and morphology, habitus, and/or microecological distribution. This implies that ‘standard’ biological information about each traditional species may be an unconscious mix of interspecific information, and begs renewed DNA barcoding, closer attention to so-called intraspecific variation, and increased museum collection and curation of specimens from more individual and ecologically characterised sites – as well as eventually more species descriptions. Simultaneously, this inclusion of sibling species as individual entities in biodiversity studies, rather than pooled under one traditional name, reduces the degree of ecological and evolutionary generalisation perceived by the observer."
10aADULT MORPHOLOGY10aAUTOMERIS10aBARCODE GAP10aBARCODING10aCAIO10aCOI10aCOSTA RICA10aDIRPHIA10aDNA10aEACLES10aHYLESIA10aMALE GENITALIA10aOTHORENE10aPERIPHOBA10aPTILOSCOLA10aSATURNIIDAE10aSPECIES DELIMITATION10aSYSSPHINX10aTAXONOMY1 aJanzen, D.H.1 aHallwachs, W.1 aHarvey, D.J.1 aDarrow, K.1 aRougerie, R.1 aHajibabaei, M.1 aSmith, M.A.1 aBertrand, C.1 aGamboa, I.C.1 aEspinoza, B.1 aSullivan, J.B.1 aDecaëns, T.1 aHerbin, D.1 aChavarria, L.F.1 aFranco, R.1 aCambronero, H.1 aRios, S.1 aQuesada, F.1 aPereira, G.1 aVargas, J.1 aGuadamuz, A.1 aEspinoza, R.1 aHernandez, J.1 aRios, L.1 aCantillano, E.1 aMoraga, R.1 aMoraga, C.1 aRios, P.1 aRios, M.1 aCalero, R.1 aMartinez, D.1 aBriceño, D.1 aCarmona, M.1 aApu, E.1 aAragon, K.1 aUmaña, C.1 aPerez, J.1 aCordoba, A.1 aUmaña, P.1 aSihezar, G.1 aEspinoza, O.1 aCano, C.1 aAraya, E.1 aGarcia, D.1 aRamirez, H.1 aPereira, M.1 aCortez, J.1 aPereira, M.1 aMedina, W.1 aHebert, P.D.N. uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1071/is1203800698nas a2200253 4500008004100000245006000041210006000101300001300161490000800174653002500182653001400207653000800221653001500229653000800244653001600252653001600268653002100284653002500305100001700330700001700347700001800364700001700382856004500399 2016 eng d00aAdvancing taxonomy and bioinventories with DNA barcodes0 aAdvancing taxonomy and bioinventories with DNA barcodes a201503390 v37110aBARCODE INDEX NUMBER10aBARCODING10aCOI10aCOSTA RICA10aDNA10aGEOMETRIDAE10aINVENTORIES10aPAPUA NEW GUINEA10aSPECIES DELIMITATION1 aMiller, S.E.1 aHausmann, A.1 aHallwachs, W.1 aJanzen, D.H. uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.033900863nas a2200313 4500008004100000024001700041245009500058210006900153260000900222300001400231490000800245653001400253653001700267653000800284653001500292653002000307653000800327653001600335653001600351653001500367653001300382100001700395700001900412700001600431700001800447700001600465700001900481856004900500 2005 eng d aPapyrus 765900aWedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding0 aWedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidopter c2005 a1835-18450 v36010aBARCODING10aBIODIVERSITY10aCOI10aCOSTA RICA10aCRYPTIC SPECIES10aDNA10aHESPERIIDAE10aSATURNIIDAE10aSPHINGIDAE10aTAXONOMY1 aJanzen, D.H.1 aHajibabaei, M.1 aBurns, J.M.1 aHallwachs, W.1 aRemigio, E.1 aHebert, P.D.N. uhttps://sphingidae.myspecies.info/node/1860600756nas a2200277 4500008004100000024001700041245006100058210006100119260001200180300001200192490000800204653001400212653001900226653000800245653001500253653001600268653001600284653001600300653001500316100001900331700001700350700001600367700001800383700001900401856005800420 2006 eng d aPapyrus 753200aDNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera0 aDNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera c01/2006 a968-9710 v10310aBARCODING10aCLASSIFICATION10aCOI10aCOSTA RICA10aHESPERIIDAE10aLEPIDOPTERA10aSATURNIIDAE10aSPHINGIDAE1 aHajibabaei, M.1 aJanzen, D.H.1 aBurns, J.M.1 aHallwachs, W.1 aHebert, P.D.N. uhttps://www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.0510466103