<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Takano, H.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Morgan, L.E.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A revision of the genus Poloma Walker, 1855 (Lepidoptera, Eupterotidae) with the description of a new genus</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zootaxa</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CATALOGUE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DRACOPOLOMA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EUPTEROTIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MALE GENITALIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">POLOMA</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2025</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">29/04/2025</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5627.3.6</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5627</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">526-538</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Investigations into the four monkey moth species hitherto considered to belong to the genus &lt;em&gt;Poloma &lt;/em&gt;Walker, 1855&amp;nbsp;produced unexpected results. Based on the configurations of the male genitalia, the constituent members of the genus could confidently be grouped into two pairs of species that were perceived not to be congeneric with each other. After examination of all type material and mining locality data from specimens housed in institutional collections as well as online resources, &lt;em&gt;Poloma &lt;/em&gt;is fully revised resulting in the description of a new genus, &lt;em&gt;Dracopoloma &lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;gen. nov.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;Poloma &lt;/em&gt;now contains only its type species, &lt;em&gt;P. angulata &lt;/em&gt;Walker, 1855 and the allied &lt;em&gt;P. variegata&lt;/em&gt; (Rothschild, 1917), while the other two species are placed in the new genus: &lt;em&gt;Dracopoloma castanaea&lt;/em&gt; (Aurivillius, 1901) &lt;strong&gt;comb. nov.&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;em&gt;D. nigromaculata&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;(Aurivillius, 1893) &lt;strong&gt;comb. nov.&lt;/strong&gt; All four species are restricted to southern Africa and their distribution patterns as well as phenology are briefly discussed.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">526</style></section></record></records></xml>