@article {22999,
	title = {Critical re-examination of known purported fossil Bombycoidea (Lepidoptera)},
	journal = {PeerJ},
	volume = {11},
	year = {2023},
	month = {11/2023},
	pages = {e16049},
	chapter = {e16049},
	abstract = {<p>\&quot;We critically re-examine 17 records of fossils currently assigned to the lepidopteran superfamily Bombycoidea, which includes the silk moths, emperor moths and hawk moths. These records include subfossils, compression and impression fossils, permineralizations and ichnofossils. We assess whether observable morphological features warrant their confident assignment to the superfamily. None of the examined fossils displays characters that allow unequivocal identification as Sphingidae, but three fossils and a subfossil (<em>Mioclanis shanwangiana</em> Zhang, Sun and Zhang, 1994, two fossil larvae, and a proboscis in asphaltum) have combinations of diagnostic features that support placement in the family. The identification of a fossil pupa as Bunaeini (Saturniidae) is well supported. The other fossils that we evaluate lack definitive bombycoid and, in several cases, even lepidopteran characters. Some of these dubious fossils have been used as calibration points in earlier studies casting doubt on the resulting age estimates. All fossil specimens reliably assigned to Bombycoidea are relatively young, the earliest fossil evidence of the superfamily dating to the middle Miocene.\&quot;</p>
},
	keywords = {ATTACUS, BOMBYCITES, BOMBYCOIDEA, COCOON, FOSSILS, MIOCLANIS, PROBOSCIS, PUPATION CHAMBER, SATURNIIDAE, SPHINGIDAE, SPHINGIDITES},
	doi = {10.7717/peerj.16049},
	author = {Heikkil{\"a}, M. and Minet, J. and Zwick, A. and Hundsdoerfer, A. and Rougerie, R. and Kitching, I.J.}
}
