02736nas a2200313   4500008004100000245009900041210006900140300001900209490000700228520186300235653000902098653001102107653001302118653001502131653002502146653001502171653001602186653002702202653001502229653001402244100001802258700001602276700001902292700001802311700001902329700001802348700001802366856003802384       2020                        eng d00aBats and hawkmoths form mixed modules with flowering plants in a nocturnal interaction network0 aBats and hawkmoths form mixed modules with flowering plants in a  aXXX-XXX [1-12]0 vXX3 a<p>&quot;Based on the conceptual framework of pollination syndromes, pollination networks should be composed of well-delimited subgroups formed by plants that diverge in floral phenotypes and are visited by taxonomically different pollinators. Nevertheless, floral traits are not always accurate in predicting floral visitors. For instance, flowers adapted to bat-pollination are larger and wider, enabling the exploitation by other nocturnal animals, such as hawkmoths. Thus, should an interaction network comprising bats and hawkmoths, the most important nocturnal pollinators in the tropics, be formed of mixed-taxon modules due to cross-syndrome interactions? Here, we analyzed such a network to test whether resource plants are shared between the two taxa, and how modules differ in terms of species morphologies. We sampled interactions through pollen grains collected from floral visitors in a Caatinga dry forest in northeastern Brazil. The network was modular yet interwoven by cross-syndrome interactions. Hawkmoths showed no restriction to visit the wider chiropterophilous flowers. Furthermore, bats represented a subset of a hawkmoth-dominated network, as they were restricted to chiropterophilous flowers due to constraints in accessing narrower sphingophilous flowers. As such, the bat-dominated module encompassed relatively wider flowers, but hawkmoths, especially long-tongued ones, were unrestricted by floral width or length. Thus, pollination of flowers with open architectures must be investigated with caution, as they are accessible to a wide array of floral visitors, which may result in mixed-pollination systems. Future research should continue to integrate different syndromes and pollinator groups in order to reach a better understanding of how pollination-related functions emerge from community-level interactions.&quot;</p>
10aBATS10aBRAZIL10aCAATINGA10aDRY FOREST10aINTERACTION NETWORKS10aMODULARITY10aPOLLINATION10aPOLLINATOR SPECIFICITY10aSPHINGIDAE10aWORLDMAP11 aQueiroz, J.A.1 aDiniz, U.M.1 aVázquez, D.P.1 aQuirino, Z.M.1 aSantos, F.A.R.1 aMello, M.A.R.1 aMachado, I.C.  uhttps://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12902