04047nas a2200973 4500008004100000022001400041024001700055245011000072210006900182260000900251300001200260490000700272520168800279653002101967653001401988653001602002653001402018653000902032653000802041653001502049653001202064653000802076653001102084653001202095653001902107653001302126653001402139653001502153653001602168653002502184653001402209653001302223100001702236700001802253700001702271700001502288700001702303700001902320700001602339700001702355700001702372700001702389700001902406700001702425700001502442700002002457700001502477700001902492700001302511700001602524700001602540700001502556700001702571700001702588700001802605700001302623700001902636700001502655700001502670700001302685700001302698700001502711700001702726700001702743700001602760700001202776700001502788700001502803700001402818700001602832700001502848700001602863700001702879700001302896700001402909700001502923700001602938700001602954700001502970700001602985700001503001700001903016856003803035 2012 eng d a1445-5226 aPapyrus 357300aWhat happens to the traditional taxonomy when a well-known tropical saturniid moth fauna is DNA barcoded?0 aWhat happens to the traditional taxonomy when a wellknown tropic c2012 a478-5050 v263 a
"We propose that the many different, but essentially similar, eye-like and face-like color patterns displayed by hundreds of species of tropical caterpillars and pupae—26 examples of which are displayed here from the dry, cloud, and rain forests of Area de Conservacion Guanacaste (ACG) in northwestern Costa Rica—constitute a huge and pervasive mimicry complex that is evolutionarily generated and sustained by the survival behavior of a large and multispecific array of potential predators: the insect-eating birds. We propose that these predators are variously and innately programmed to flee when abruptly confronted, at close range, with what appears to be an eye of one of their predators. Such a mimetic complex differs from various classical Batesian and Müllerian mimicry complexes of adult butterflies in that (i) the predators sustain it for the most part by innate traits rather than by avoidance behavior learned through disagreeable experiences, (ii) the more or less harmless, sessile, and largely edible mimics vastly outnumber the models, and (iii) there is no particular selection for the eye-like color pattern to closely mimic the eye or face of any particular predator of the insect-eating birds or that of any other member of this mimicry complex. Indeed, selection may not favor exact resemblance among these mimics at all. Such convergence through selection could create a superabundance of one particular false eyespot or face pattern, thereby increasing the likelihood of a bird species or guild learning to associate that pattern with harmless prey."
10aBEHAVIOUR10aEYESPOT10aIMMATURE STAGES10aLEPIDOPTERA10aMIMICRY10aPREDATION10aPREDATOR AVOIDANCE10aPUPA1 aJanzen, D.H.1 aHallwachs, W.1 aBurns, J.M. uhttps://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.091212210700698nas a2200253 4500008004100000245006000041210006000101300001300161490000800174653002500182653001400207653000800221653001500229653000800244653001600252653001600268653002100284653002500305100001700330700001700347700001800364700001700382856004500399 2016 eng d00aAdvancing taxonomy and bioinventories with DNA barcodes0 aAdvancing taxonomy and bioinventories with DNA barcodes a201503390 v37110aBARCODE INDEX NUMBER10aBARCODING10aCOI10aCOSTA RICA10aDNA10aGEOMETRIDAE10aINVENTORIES10aPAPUA NEW GUINEA10aSPECIES DELIMITATION1 aMiller, S.E.1 aHausmann, A.1 aHallwachs, W.1 aJanzen, D.H. uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.033901103nas a2200421 4500008004100000024001700041245011500058210006900173300001200242490000700254653002300261653001400284653001700298653000800315653000800323653001200331653000800343653001400351653001300365653001200378653002000390653002300410653001200433653001400445653000900459653001000468653001500478653001300493653001400506100001600520700002000536700001500556700001700571700001700588700001800605700001900623856003900642 2015 eng d aPapyrus 911800aA molecular phylogeny of Eumorpha (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) and the evolution of anti-predator larval eyespots0 amolecular phylogeny of Eumorpha Lepidoptera Sphingidae and the e a401-4080 v4010aBAYESIAN INFERENCE10aBEHAVIOUR10aBIOGEOGRAPHY10aCAD10aCOI10aDEFENCE10aDNA10aEF-1ALPHA10aEUMORPHA10aEYESPOT10aIMMATURE STAGES10aMAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD10aMIMICRY10aPHYLOGENY10aRASP10aRAXML10aSPHINGIDAE10aWINGLESS10aWORLDMAP11 aPonce, F.V.1 aBreinholt, J.W.1 aHossie, T.1 aBarber, J.R.1 aJanzen, D.H.1 aHallwachs, W.1 aKawahara, A.Y. uhttps://doi.org/10.1111/syen.1211103620nas a2200301 4500008004100000024001700041245012800058210006900186260000900255300000700264490000700271520274900278653001403027653000803041653002603049653001903075653001503094100001703109700001703126700001803143700001703161700001803178700001903196700001903215700001603234700001903250856004903269 2011 eng d aPapyrus 872600aWhen species matches are unavailable are DNA barcodes correctly assigned to higher taxa? An assessment using sphingid moths0 aWhen species matches are unavailable are DNA barcodes correctly c2011 a180 v113 a"Background
When a specimen belongs to a species not yet represented in DNA barcode reference libraries there is disagreement over the effectiveness of using sequence comparisons to assign the query accurately to a higher taxon. Library completeness and the assignment criteria used have been proposed as critical factors affecting the accuracy of such assignments but have not been thoroughly investigated. We explored the accuracy of assignments to genus, tribe and subfamily in the Sphingidae, using the almost complete global DNA barcode reference library (1095 species) available for this family. Costa Rican sphingids (118 species), a well-documented, diverse subset of the family, with each of the tribes and subfamilies represented were used as queries. We simulated libraries with different levels of completeness (10-100% of the available species), and recorded assignments (positive or ambiguous) and their accuracy (true or false) under six criteria.
Results
A liberal tree-based criterion assigned 83% of queries accurately to genus, 74% to tribe and 90% to subfamily, compared to a strict tree-based criterion, which assigned 75% of queries accurately to genus, 66% to tribe and 84% to subfamily, with a library containing 100% of available species (but excluding the species of the query). The greater number of true positives delivered by more relaxed criteria was negatively balanced by the occurrence of more false positives. This effect was most sharply observed with libraries of the lowest completeness where, for example at the genus level, 32% of assignments were false positives with the liberal criterion versus < 1% when using the strict. We observed little difference (< 8% using the liberal criterion) however, in the overall accuracy of the assignments between the lowest and highest levels of library completeness at the tribe and subfamily level.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that when using a strict tree-based criterion for higher taxon assignment with DNA barcodes, the likelihood of assigning a query a genus name incorrectly is very low, if a genus name is provided it has a high likelihood of being accurate, and if no genus match is available the query can nevertheless be assigned to a subfamily with high accuracy regardless of library completeness. DNA barcoding often correctly assigned sphingid moths to higher taxa when species matches were unavailable, suggesting that barcode reference libraries can be useful for higher taxon assignments long before they achieve complete species coverage."
10aBARCODING10aDNA10aHIGHER CLASSIFICATION10aIDENTIFICATION10aSPHINGIDAE1 aWilson, J.J.1 aRougerie, R.1 aSchonfeld, J.1 aJanzen, D.H.1 aHallwachs, W.1 aHajibabaei, M.1 aKitching, I.J.1 aHaxaire, J.1 aHebert, P.D.N. uhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/11/1800730nas a2200229 4500008004100000024001700041245011000058210007000168260000900238653001700247653001900264653001500283653001400298653002400312653002000336653001800356653001600374653001500390100001700405700001800422856006000440 2018 eng d aPapyrus 588900aArea de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG), northwestern Costa Rica. Caterpillars, pupae, butterflies & moths0 aArea de Conservación Guanacaste ACG northwestern Costa Rica Cate c200510aAPATELODIDAE10aCATE DIAGNOSIS10aCOSTA RICA10aFOODPLANT10aIMMATURE MORPHOLOGY10aIMMATURE STAGES10aLASIOCAMPIDAE10aSATURNIIDAE10aSPHINGIDAE1 aJanzen, D.H.1 aHallwachs, W. uhttp://janzen.sas.upenn.edu/caterpillars/database.lasso00863nas a2200313 4500008004100000024001700041245009500058210006900153260000900222300001400231490000800245653001400253653001700267653000800284653001500292653002000307653000800327653001600335653001600351653001500367653001300382100001700395700001900412700001600431700001800447700001600465700001900481856004900500 2005 eng d aPapyrus 765900aWedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding0 aWedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidopter c2005 a1835-18450 v36010aBARCODING10aBIODIVERSITY10aCOI10aCOSTA RICA10aCRYPTIC SPECIES10aDNA10aHESPERIIDAE10aSATURNIIDAE10aSPHINGIDAE10aTAXONOMY1 aJanzen, D.H.1 aHajibabaei, M.1 aBurns, J.M.1 aHallwachs, W.1 aRemigio, E.1 aHebert, P.D.N. uhttps://sphingidae.myspecies.info/node/1860600776nas a2200265 4500008004100000024001700041245011800058210006900176260000900245300001400254490000700268653001500275653001300290653001200303653001400315653002000329653001200349653001500361653001400376100001700390700001900407700001700426700001800443856004900461 2013 eng d aPapyrus 166700aAn eyespot that "blinks": an open and shut case of eye mimicry in Eumorpha caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae)0 aeyespot that blinks an open and shut case of eye mimicry in Eumo c2013 a2915-29260 v4710aCOSTA RICA10aEUMORPHA10aEYESPOT10aFOODPLANT10aIMMATURE STAGES10aMIMICRY10aSPHINGIDAE10aWORLDMAP11 aHossie, T.J.1 aSherratt, T.N.1 aJanzen, D.H.1 aHallwachs, W. uhttps://sphingidae.myspecies.info/node/1850800756nas a2200277 4500008004100000024001700041245006100058210006100119260001200180300001200192490000800204653001400212653001900226653000800245653001500253653001600268653001600284653001600300653001500316100001900331700001700350700001600367700001800383700001900401856005800420 2006 eng d aPapyrus 753200aDNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera0 aDNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera c01/2006 a968-9710 v10310aBARCODING10aCLASSIFICATION10aCOI10aCOSTA RICA10aHESPERIIDAE10aLEPIDOPTERA10aSATURNIIDAE10aSPHINGIDAE1 aHajibabaei, M.1 aJanzen, D.H.1 aBurns, J.M.1 aHallwachs, W.1 aHebert, P.D.N. uhttps://www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.0510466103