<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Du, D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Huang, Y.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Naumann, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kitching, I.J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xu, Z.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sun, Y.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wang, X.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mitochondrial genomes of two wild silkmoths, Samia watsoni and Samia wangi (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae), and their phylogenetic implications</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">European Journal of Entomology</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BAYESIAN INFERENCE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BOMBYCIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DNA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MITOGENOME</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PHYLOGENY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SAMIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2022</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08/2022</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">119</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">337-353</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The wild silkmoth genus &lt;em&gt;Samia &lt;/em&gt;H&amp;uuml;bner, 1819 (Saturniidae) contains a number of economically important species in industrial silk production. However, the interspecific relationships within the genus remain unclear. We sequence the mitogenomes of &lt;em&gt;Samia watsoni &lt;/em&gt;Oberth&amp;uuml;r, 1914 and &lt;em&gt;Samia wangi&lt;/em&gt; Naumann &amp;amp; Peigler, 2001. Both mitogenomes are annotated and found to be cyclized, with 37 genes (13 PCGs, 2 rRNA genes and 22 tRNA genes). Using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods, we analyze these mitogenomes together with a further 68 downloaded from GenBank (65 Bombycoidea and 5 Lasiocampidae as the outgroup) to investigate the phylogenetic relationships both within the genus and those among the three families of the &amp;lsquo;SBS&amp;rsquo; group: Bombycidae, Saturniidae and Sphingidae. The results show that within &lt;em&gt;Samia&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;S. ricini &lt;/em&gt;is closely related to &lt;em&gt;S. canningi&lt;/em&gt;, and not &lt;em&gt;S. cynthia&lt;/em&gt; of which it has previously been considered to be a subspecies. Although arguments have been proposed to treat &lt;em&gt;S. ricini &lt;/em&gt;and &lt;em&gt;S. canningi&lt;/em&gt; as conspecific, we choose to accept the morphological arguments and continue to treat them as two separate species. &lt;em&gt;Samia watsoni&lt;/em&gt; is corroborated as the sister group of all other &lt;em&gt;Samia &lt;/em&gt;species, but nevertheless should be included within &lt;em&gt;Samia &lt;/em&gt;rather than being placed in its own monobasic genus. Our analysis recovers the following relationship among the three families of the &amp;lsquo;SBS&amp;rsquo; group: (Saturniidae + (Bombycidae + Sphingidae)). This agrees with previous studies based on analysis of mitogenomes but continues to contradict the results derived from phylogenomic analysis of nuclear genomes.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">337</style></section></record></records></xml>