<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zheng, X.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Xu, Z.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wang, D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zhou, C.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Life history and mitochondrial genomes of Salassinae and Agliinae (Insecta, Lepidoptera): new insights into the loss of cocooning behaviour and phylogeny of Saturniidae</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bulletin of Entomological Research</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ACTIAS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AGLIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ANTHERAEA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ATTACUS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BAYESIAN INFERENCE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CHINA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">COCOON</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CRICULA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FOODPLANT</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IMMATURE STAGES</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LIFE HISTORY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LOEPA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MITOGENOME</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MTDNA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NEORIS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PHYLOGENY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RHODINIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SALASSA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SAMIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2024</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9/1/2024</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485323000676</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">114</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">107-123</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The subfamilies Salassinae and Agliinae are two monogeneric groups of the family Saturniidae. They were regarded as the non-cocooning saturniids in Asia. Since very little information on their life history and mitogenome has been reported, their origin and evolution are still poorly understood. In this study, nature-imitated rearing is used to record the life history of two &lt;em&gt;Aglia &lt;/em&gt;and five &lt;em&gt;Salassa &lt;/em&gt;species. In addition, four complete mitogenomes are presented, which are the first ones of these two subfamilies. The results show that both Salassinae and Agliinae have lost their cocooning. Moreover, the phylogenetic analysis demonstrates that the subfamily Saturniinae is not monophyletic due to the inclusion of Agliinae and Salassinae.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">107</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cheng, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Liu, Y.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zheng, X.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zhang, R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Feng, K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yue, B.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Du, C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zhou, C.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Characterization of seventeen complete mitochondrial genomes: structural features and phylogenetic implications of the lepidopteran insects</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Insects</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BAYESIAN INFERENCE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BOMBYCOIDEA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DNA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DOLBINA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LASIOCAMPIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LEPIDOPTERA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MITOGENOME</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PARALEBEDA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PHYLLOSPHINGIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PHYLOGENY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RHAGASTIS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2022</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10/2022</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13110998</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">998</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) are widely distributed in the world, but high‐level phylogeny in Lepidoptera remains uncertain. More mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) data can help to conduct comprehensive analysis and construct a robust phylogenetic tree. Here, we sequenced and annotated 17 complete moth mitogenomes and made comparative analysis with other moths. The gene order of trnM‐trnI‐trnQ in 17 moths was different from trnI‐trnQ‐trnM of ancestral insects. The number, type, and order of genes were consistent with reported moths. The length of newly sequenced complete mitogenomes ranged from 14,231 bp of &lt;em&gt;Rhagastis albomarginatus&lt;/em&gt; to 15,756 bp of &lt;em&gt;Numenes albofascia&lt;/em&gt;. These moth mitogenomes were typically with high A+T contents varied from 76.0% to 81.7% and exhibited negative GC skews. Among 13 protein coding genes (PCGs), some unusual initiations and terminations were found in part of newly sequenced moth mitogenomes. Three conserved gene‐overlapping regions and one conserved intergenic region were detected among 17 mitogenomes. The phylogenetic relationship of major superfamilies in Macroheterocera was as follows: (Bombycoidea + Lasiocampoidea) + ((Drepanoidea + Geometroidea) + Noctuoidea)), which was different from previous studies. Moreover, the topology of Noctuoidea as (Notodontidae + (Erebidae + Noctuidae)) was supported by high Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP = 1.0) and bootstrapping values (BSV = 100). This study greatly enriched the mitogenome database of moth and strengthened the high‐level phylogenetic relationships of Lepidoptera.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">998</style></section></record></records></xml>