<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Böttger, D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Diniz, U.M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Keller, A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leonhardt, S.A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brehm, G.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Moth communities are more diverse in the understory than in the canopy of a tropical lowland rainforest in NW Ecuador</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ecology and Evolution</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ARCTIINAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ECOLOGY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ECUADOR</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GEOMETRIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">HEDYLIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RAINFOREST</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">STRATIFICATION</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2026</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73337</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">e73337</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Tropical rainforests are the most species-rich&amp;nbsp;terrestrial habitats and provide distinct niches for specialization and speciation, in part due to their vertical stratification. Stratification is observed in many insect orders as a result of abiotic factors, resource availability, competition, and behavior. Here, we investigate five clades of Lepidoptera, which differ in many aspects of their ecology and traits. We aim for a better understanding of the stratification patterns of Erebidae-Arctiinae, Geometridae, Hedylidae, Saturniidae, and Sphingidae. The study was carried out in a tropical rainforest of the Choc&amp;oacute; region in NW Ecuador in 2021 and 2022. We used funnel traps equipped with weak UV-lamps to sample moths simultaneously in the canopy and understory in four forest habitats. We identified species using reference collections and DNA barcoding and present a qualitatively unique database for Neotropical rainforests, with 12,472 individuals of 676 species collected in 48 nightly catches. Average species richness was higher in the understory (73.54 &amp;plusmn; 22.58) than in the canopy (59.09 &amp;plusmn; 17.24), and median sample sizes were similar (understory: 217.5 (160.5&amp;ndash;336), canopy: 187.5 (138&amp;ndash;328.5)). We found taxon-specific patterns: Arctiinae and Sphingidae&amp;mdash;the stronger flyers&amp;mdash;were more species-rich and abundant in the canopy, and weaker flyers Geometridae and Saturniidae were more species-rich and abundant in the understory. We assume that predation pressure, availability of nectar and host plants shape the vertical distribution of moth assemblages. Communities largely overlapped, were highly nested in each stratum and between habitat types, and differences in composition among habitats were mainly driven by elevation. We found more species in regenerating forests compared to old growth forests, while sample size was only marginally influenced by trap height but independent of elevation, temperature, and humidity.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">e73337</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Deml, R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dettner, K.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chemical defence of emperor moths and tussock moths (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae, Lymantriidae)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Entomologia Generalis</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DEFENCE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EXOCRINE GLANDS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">HAEMOLYMPH</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IMMATURE MORPHOLOGY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LYMANTRIINAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SCOLI</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1997</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/1997</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">225-251</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">225</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jacobson, N.L.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Parasitoid and larval food plant records for three Peruvian moths (Arctiidae, Saturniidae)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ARCTIINAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AUTOMERIS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BRACONIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FOODPLANT</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PARASITOIDS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PERU</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TACHINIDAE</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1991</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">45</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">173-175</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">173</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ghanavi, H.R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Twort, V.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hartman, T.J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zahiri, R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wahlberg, N.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The (non) accuracy of mitochondrial genomes for family-level phylogenetics in Erebidae (Lepidoptera)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zoologica Scripta</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DNA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MITOGENOME</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PHYLOGENY</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2022</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12559</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">XX</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">[1-13]</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The use of molecular data to study the evolutionary history of organisms has revolutionized the field of systematics. Now with the appearance of high throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies, more and more genetic sequence data are available. One of the important sources of genetic data for phylogenetic analyses has been mitochondrial DNA. The limitations of mitochondrial DNA for the study of phylogenetic relationships have been thoroughly explored in the age of single locus phylogenetic studies. Now with the appearance of genomic scale data, increasing number of mitochondrial genomes are available, leading to an increasing number of mitophylogenomic studies. Here, we assemble 47 mitochondrial genomes using whole genome Illumina short reads from representatives of the family Erebidae (Lepidoptera), in order to evaluate the accuracy of mitochondrial genome application in resolving deep phylogenetic relationships. We find that mitogenomes are inadequate for resolving subfamily-level relationships in Erebidae, but given good taxon sampling, we see its potential in resolving lower level phylogenetic relationships.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">XXX</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ancajima, G.P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Grados, J.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">First records of Sphingidae, Saturniidae, and Arctiinae (Lepidoptera) in the forests of Polylepis sericea in the Huascarán National Park, Ancash, Peru</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Entomological Communications</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AGRIUS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ARCTIINAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">COPAXA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ERINNYIS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PERU</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">POLYLEPIS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WORLDMAP1</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2022</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ec04019</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;em&gt;Polylepis &lt;/em&gt;forests are home to endemic species and are of great ecological importance. The degradation of these forests, a remarkable and unique biome in the Andean region, might cause severe consequences for the yet poorly studied high-altitude biota. In the context of Global Climate Change and other anthropogenic impacts, such as habitat loss and species invasion, the threat in this region is alarming. Therefore, studies informing about fauna and flora in this area are essential for conservation efforts and political decisions. In this study, we performed an inventory of three nocturnal Lepidoptera taxa (Sphingidae, Saturniidae, and Arctiinae) in &lt;em&gt;Polylepis &lt;/em&gt;forests of the Huascar&amp;aacute;n National Park. The Huascar&amp;aacute;n National Park is a reserve in the Ancash region in the Andean zone of Peru. The specimens were collected using mixed light traps, from 18:00 to 24:00 hours in November (2015), February (2016), May (2016), and August (2016). We recorded seven species and 155 individuals, corresponding to two species of Sphingidae, one of Saturniidae, and four of Arctiinae. All the species presented are new records for the Huascar&amp;aacute;n National Park, three are new records for the department of Ancash and one new record for Peru.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ec04019</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>34</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barber, J.R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Plotkin, D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rubin, J.J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Homziak, N.T.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leavell, B.C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Houlihan, P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Miner, K.A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Breinholt, J.W.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Quirk-Royal, B.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Padrón, P.S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nunez, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kawahara, A.Y.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ACOUSTICS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">APOSEMATISM</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BATS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DEFENCE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DIVERSITY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EVOLUTION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">HEARING</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">JAMMING</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LEPIDOPTERA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MIMICRY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PREDATOR AVOIDANCE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">STRIDULATION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TYMBAL ORGANS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ULTRASONICS</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">09/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.20.460855</style></url></web-urls></urls><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-31</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Warning signals are well known in the visual system, but rare in other modalities. Some moths produce ultrasonic sounds to warn bats of noxious taste or to mimic unpalatable models. Here we report results from a long-term study across the globe, assaying moth response to playback of bat echolocation. We tested 252 genera, spanning most families of large-bodied moths, and outline anti-bat ultrasound production in 52 genera, with eight new subfamily origins described. Based on acoustic analysis of ultrasonic emissions and palatability experiments with bats, it seems that acoustic warning and mimicry are the raison d&amp;#39;etre for sound production in most moths. However, some moths use high-density ultrasound capable of jamming bat sonar. In fact, we find preliminary evidence of independent origins of sonar jamming in at least six subfamilies. Palatability data indicates that jamming and warning are not mutually exclusive strategies. To explore the possible organization of anti-bat warning sounds into acoustic mimicry rings, we intensively studied a community of moths in Ecuador and found five distinct acoustic clusters using machine learning algorithms. While these data represent an early understanding of acoustic aposematism and mimicry across this megadiverse insect order, it is likely that ultrasonically-signaling moths comprise one of the largest mimicry complexes on earth.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">bioRxiv preprint</style></work-type></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aulombard, F.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">La montagne de Kpimé, une localité intéressante au Togo avec description d'une nouvelle forme de Mazuka [sic] Walker (Lep. Noctuidae Xyleninae)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Saturnafrica</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CHECKLIST</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TEMNORA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TOGO</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WORLDMAP1</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2021</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">28</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">33-40</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">33</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rabl, D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gottsberger, B.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brehm, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hofhansl, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fiedler, K.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Moth assemblages in Costa Rica rain forest mirror small‐scale topographic heterogeneity</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Biotropica</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ABUNDANCE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BIODIVERSITY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">COSTA RICA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ECOLOGY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GEOMETRIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">HERBIVORY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">OROGRAPHIC HETEROGENEITY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RICHNESS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WORLDMAP1</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12677</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">XX</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">XXX-XXX [14 pp.]</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;In many tropical lowland rain forests, topographic variation increases environmental heterogeneity, thus contributing to the extraordinary biodiversity of tropical lowland forests. While a growing number of studies have addressed effects of topographic differences on tropical insect communities at regional scales (e.g., along extensive elevational gradients), surprisingly little is known about topographic effects at smaller spatial scales. The present study investigates moth assemblages in a topographically heterogeneous lowland rain forest landscape, at distances of less than a few hundred meters, in the Golfo Dulce region (SW Costa Rica). Three moth lineages&amp;mdash;Erebidae&amp;ndash;Arctiinae (tiger and lichen moths), the bombycoid complex, and Geometridae (inchworm moths)&amp;mdash;were examined by means of automatic light traps in three different forest types: creek forest, slope forest, and ridge forest. Altogether, 6,543 individuals of 419 species were observed. Moth assemblages differed significantly between the three forest types regarding species richness, total abundance, and species composition. Moth richness and abundance increased more than fourfold and eightfold from creek over slope to ridge forest sites. All three taxonomic units showed identical biodiversity patterns, notwithstanding their strong differences in multiple eco‐morphological traits. An indicator species analysis revealed that most species identified as characteristic were associated either with the ridge forest alone or with ridge plus slope forests, but very few with the creek forest. Despite their mobility, local moth assemblages are highly differentially filtered from the same regional species pool. Hence, variation in environmental factors significantly affects assemblages of tropical moth species at small spatial scales.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Early view</style></work-type><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">XXX</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dvořák, B.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bemerkungen zur Verhaltensweise und Phänologie der Raupen von Pseudosphinx tetrio (Linnaeus, 1777) und verwandten Dilophonotini-Genera (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae): wer ahmt wen nach?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nachrichten des Entomologischen Vereins Apollo (N.F.)</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">APOSEMATISM</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ARSENURA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ASOTA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BEHAVIOUR</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FOODPLANT SPECIFICITY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GREGARIOUSNESS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IMMATURE STAGES</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ISOGNATHUS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MANDUCA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MIMICRY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PACHYLIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PHENOLOGY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PSEUDOSPHINX</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SNAKES</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">38</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">183-190</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">183</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Volf, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Segar, S.T.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Miller, S.E.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Isua, B.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sisol, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aubona, G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Šimek, P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Moos, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laitila, L.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kim, J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zima_Jr, J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rota, J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Weiblen, G.D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wossa, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Salminen, J.-P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Basset, Y.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Novotny, V.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Community structure of insect herbivores is driven by conservatism, escalation and divergence of defensive traits in Ficus</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ecology Letters</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AGANAINAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ALKALOIDS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ASOTA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CHOREUTIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">COEVOLUTION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CYSTEINE PROTEASE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DEFENCE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FICUS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FOODPLANT SPECIFICITY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">HERBIVORY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MORACEAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NEW GUINEA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">POLYPHENOLS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PYRALOIDEA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TRAITS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TRICHOMES</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Escalation (macroevolutionary increase) or divergence (disparity between relatives) in trait values are two frequent outcomes of the plant-herbivore arms race. We studied the defences and caterpillars associated with 21 sympatric New Guinean figs. Herbivore generalists were concentrated on hosts with low protease and oxidative activity. The distribution of specialists correlated with phylogeny, protease and trichomes. Additionally, highly specialised &lt;em&gt;Asota &lt;/em&gt;moths used alkaloid rich plants. The evolution of proteases was conserved, alkaloid diversity has escalated across the studied species, oxidative activity has escalated within one clade, and trichomes have diverged across the phylogeny. Herbivore specificity correlated with their response to host defences: escalating traits largely affected&amp;nbsp; generalists and divergent traits specialists; but the effect of escalating traits on extreme specialists was positive. In turn, the evolution of defences in &lt;em&gt;Ficus &lt;/em&gt;can be driven towards both escalation and divergence in individual traits, in combination providing protection against a broad spectrum of herbivores.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Early view</style></work-type></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Basquin, P.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">État de nos connaissances des Lépidoptères Hétérocères de São Tomé et Principe</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Saturnafrica</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ACHERONTIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AGRIUS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BUNAEA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CEPHONODES</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">COELONIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">COSSIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DAPHNIS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EUCHLORON</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GEOMETRIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">HIPPOTION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LASIOCAMPIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NEPHELE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NOTODONTIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NUDAURELIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PRINCIPE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PSEUDOCLANIS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SAO TOME</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TEMNORA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">THERETRA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">THYRIDIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">URANIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">XANTHOPAN</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ZYGAENIDAE</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">04/2017</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11-27</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">979-10-95105-04-6</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lyttinen, A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lindström, L.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mappes, J.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ultraviolet reflection and predation risk in diurnal and nocturnal Lepidoptera</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Behavioral Ecology</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FINLAND</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LEPIDOPTERA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LYMANTRIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LYMANTRIINAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PREDATION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PREDATOR AVOIDANCE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ULTRAVIOLET REFLECTANCE</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">06/2004</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">15</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">982-987</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;According to our extensive data on Lepidoptera (883 species), UV wing patterns are almost three times more common in nocturnal than in diurnal Lepidoptera. This might be due to predation, because the primary diurnal predators, birds, utilize UV light in foraging and even prefer UV-reflecting prey. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a field experiment with tethered living moths whose wings were artificially manipulated to reflect (UV+, reflection at UV wavelength: 15%) or absorb (UV-) UV light, keeping longer wavelengths identical. Thus, any difference found in survival rates would be the result of the difference in wing patterns in UV spectrum. Significantly more UV+ moths than UV- ones were eaten in the daytime, but no difference in predation rates could be detected when moths were exposed to nocturnal predators. The different survival rates indicate that UV reflection increased predation risk by visually orienting diurnal predators. The lack of difference at night arises from the lack of UV-sensitive predators. UV wing patterns, even if they are important in intraspecies communication, seem to be costly to diurnal Lepidoptera by attracting predators.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">982</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Feuda, R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marlétaz, F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bentley, M.A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Holland, P.W.H.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conservation, duplication, and divergence of five opsin genes in insect evolution</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Genome Biology and Evolution</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BOMBYCIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BOMBYX</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">C-OPSINS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">COLOUR VISION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DAY/NIGHT TRANSITIONS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EVOLUTION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GENE DUPLICATION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">INSECTA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LWS-OPSIN</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MANDUCA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">OPSIN</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PHYLOGENY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">R-OPSINS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">VISION</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">579-587</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Opsin proteins covalently bind to small molecular chromophores and each protein-chromophore complex is sensitive to particular wavelengths of light. Multiple opsins with different wavelength absorbance peaks are required for color vision. Comparing opsin responses is challenging at low light levels, explaining why color vision is often lost in nocturnal species. Here, we investigated opsin evolution in 27 phylogenetically diverse insect species including several transitions between photic niches (nocturnal, diurnal, and crepuscular).We find widespread conservation of five distinct opsin genes, more than commonly considered.&amp;nbsp; These comprise one c-opsin plus four r-opsins (long wavelength sensitive or LWS, blue sensitive, ultra violet [UV] sensitive and the often overlooked Rh7 gene). Several recent opsin gene duplications are also detected. The diversity of opsin genes is consistent with color vision in diurnal, crepuscular, and nocturnal insects. Tests for positive selection in relation to photic niche reveal evidence for adaptive evolution in UVsensitive opsins in day-flying insects in general, and in LWS opsins of day-flying Lepidoptera specifically.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">579</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ahmed, M.Z.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Araujo-Jnr, E.V.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Welch, J.J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kawahara, A.Y.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wolbachia in butterflies and moths: geographic structure in infection frequency</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Frontiers in Zoology</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CRAMBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DNA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DREPANIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EPICOPEIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EUPTEROTIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GELECHIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GEOMETRIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GRACILLARIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">HESPERIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LASIOCAMPIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LATITUDINAL GRADIENT</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LYCAENIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NOCTUIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NYMPHALIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PAPILIONIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PIERIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PLUTELLIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PYRALIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TORTRICIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WOLBACHIA</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction&lt;/strong&gt;: Butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) constitute one of the most diverse insect orders, and play an important role in ecosystem function. However, little is known in terms of their bacterial communities. &lt;em&gt;Wolbachia&lt;/em&gt;, perhaps the most common and widespread intracellular bacterium on Earth, can manipulate the physiology and reproduction of its hosts, and is transmitted vertically from mother to offspring, or sometimes horizontally between species. While its role in some hosts has been studied extensively, its incidence across Lepidoptera is poorly understood. A recent analysis using a beta-binomial model to infer the between-species distribution of prevalence estimated that approximately 40 % of arthropod species are infected with &lt;em&gt;Wolbachia&lt;/em&gt;, but particular taxonomic groups and ecological niches seem to display substantially higher or lower incidences. In this study, we took an initial step and applied a similar, maximum likelihood approach to 300 species of Lepidoptera (7604 individuals from 660 populations) belonging to 17 families and 10 superfamilies, and sampled from 36 countries, representing all continents excluding Antarctica.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;strong&gt;Results&lt;/strong&gt;: Approximately a quarter to a third of individuals appear to be infected with &lt;em&gt;Wolbachia&lt;/em&gt;, and around 80 % of Lepidoptera species are infected at a non-negligible frequency. This incidence estimate is very high compared to arthropods in general. &lt;em&gt;Wolbachia &lt;/em&gt;infection in Lepidoptera is shown to vary between families, but there is no evidence for closely related groups to show similar infection levels. True butterflies (Papilionoidea) are overrepresented in our&lt;br /&gt;
	data, however, our estimates show this group can be taken as a representative for the other major lepidopteran superfamilies. We also show substantial variation in infection level according to geography &amp;ndash; closer locations tend to show similar infection levels. We further show that variation in geography is due to a latitudinal gradient in &lt;em&gt;Wolbachia &lt;/em&gt;infection, with lower frequencies towards higher latitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions&lt;/strong&gt;: Our comprehensive survey of &lt;em&gt;Wolbachia &lt;/em&gt;infection in Lepidoptera suggests that infection incidence is very high, and provides evidence that climate and geography are strong predictors of infection frequency.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hawes, J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Motta, C._da_S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Overal, W.L.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barlow, J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gardner, T.A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peres, C.A.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Diversity and composition of Amazonian moths in primary, secondary and plantation forests</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Tropical Ecology</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ABUNDANCE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ARCTIINAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BRAZIL</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">COMMUNITY STRUCTURE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DIVERSITY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RAREFACTION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RICHNESS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">25</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">281-300</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">281</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zenker, M.M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rougerie, R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Teston, J.A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Laguerre, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pie, M.R.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Frietas, A.V.L.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fast census of moth diversity in the Neotropics: a comparison of field-assigned morphospecies and DNA barcoding in tiger moths</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PLoS ONE</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ARCTIINAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ATLANTIC RAIN FOREST</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BARCODE GAP</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BARCODE INDEX NUMBER</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BARCODING</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BRAZIL</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">COI</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DIVERSITY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DNA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">INVENTORIES</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MORPHOSPECIES</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPECIES DELIMITATION</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2016</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">e0148423</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Roque-Albelo, L.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Two large tropical moths (Thysania zenobia (Noctuidae) and Cocytius antaeus (Sphingidae)) colonize the Galapagos Islands</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DISPERSION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ECUADOR</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GALAPAGOS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WORLDMAP1</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2000</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://images.peabody.yale.edu/lepsoc/jls/1990s/1999/1999-53(3)129-Roque.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">53</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">129-130</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">129</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Patocka, J.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Die Raupen und Puppen der Eichenschmetterlinge Mitteleuropas</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Monographien zur Angewandten Entomologie</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IMMATURE MORPHOLOGY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LASIOCAMPIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MARUMBA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MIMAS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NOLIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NOTODONTIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1980</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1980</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-188</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Osipov, P.E.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Streltzov, A.N.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lentova, S.I.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Records of Macroheterocera of families Saturniidae, Brahmaeidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae and Lymantriidae from Nature Reserve &quot;Bastak&quot;</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nature of Nature Reserve &quot;Bastak&quot;</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BRAHMAEIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LYMANTRIINAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NOTODONTIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RUSSIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WORLDMAP1</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">42-44</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">42</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Osipov, P.E.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Streltzov, A.N.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Skvortsova, V.A.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">New records of Macroheterocera of families Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae and Arctiidae from Nature Reserve &quot;Bastak&quot;</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nature of Nature Reserve &quot;Bastak&quot;</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ARCTIINAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BRAHMAEIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NOTODONTIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RUSSIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WORLDMAP1</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2005</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2005</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">30-32</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">30</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Monzón_Sierra, J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Leguerre, M.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Herbin, D.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mariposas nocturnas (familias Arctiidae, Saturniidae y Sphingidae) de la Reserva Refugio del Quetzal (Guatemala, Suchitepéquez)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Revista de la Universidad del Valle de Guatemala</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ARCTIINAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CHECKLIST</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">GUATEMALA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WORLDMAP1</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">69-87</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">69</style></section></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">de Freina, J.J.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11. Beitrag zur systematischen Erfässung der Bombyces- und Sphinges-Fauna Kleinasiens - Ergänzungen zu Artenspektrum und Verbreitungsbildern durch interessante Nachweise (Insecta, Lepidoptera)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Atalanta</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AGRIUS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ARCTIINAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BRAHMAEIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">COSSIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DEILEPHILA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EREBIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">HEMARIS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">HYLES</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LAOTHOE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LEMONIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MACROGLOSSUM</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MARUMBA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PERISOMENA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PROSERPINUS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RETHERA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SATURNIIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SMERINTHUS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINGIDAE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SPHINX</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">THERETRA</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TURKEY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">WORLDMAP1</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">43</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">191-210</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1/2</style></issue><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">191</style></section></record></records></xml>